There are many situations in which Internet access providers have the ability and incentive to block legal online video. A movie studio or cable company could potentially pay an Internet access provider to slow down or block their competitors. Internet access providers that are also cable providers have an anticompetitive incentive to slow or block alternative, online media. And Internet access providers that are cable providers and also content creators, like the merged entity that is Comcast-NBCU, have an even greater incentive to do so.
Public Knowledge’s Position
If permitted, these practices would prove detrimental not only to consumers, who would face fewer options for accessing video, but also to innovators in the online video space, who would see their ability to reach consumers subject to the anticompetitive whims of big media.
Public Knowledge is also against the use of blocking access to online content as a bargaining tool against Internet access and cable providers. For example, in October 2010, Fox unilaterally blocked access to its content by Cablevision subscribers—both via traditional cable and online—as part of a completely unrelated dispute between the companies. This is not a “network neutrality” concern as precisely understood, but could threaten the integrity of the open Internet as much as anti-competitive behavior by Internet access providers.
What you can do to help
- Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
- Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
- Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.
For more information
stdClass Object
(
[nid] => 6115
[type] => issue
[language] =>
[uid] => 1
[status] => 1
[created] => 1318264382
[changed] => 1327417172
[comment] => 0
[promote] => 0
[moderate] => 0
[sticky] => 0
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[vid] => 6176
[revision_uid] => 3459
[title] => Implications for Online Video
[body] =>
There are many situations in which Internet access providers have the ability and incentive to block legal online video. A movie studio or cable company could potentially pay an Internet access provider to slow down or block their competitors. Internet access providers that are also cable providers have an anticompetitive incentive to slow or block alternative, online media. And Internet access providers that are cable providers and also content creators, like the merged entity that is Comcast-NBCU, have an even greater incentive to do so.
Public Knowledge’s Position
If permitted, these practices would prove detrimental not only to consumers, who would face fewer options for accessing video, but also to innovators in the online video space, who would see their ability to reach consumers subject to the anticompetitive whims of big media.
Public Knowledge is also against the use of blocking access to online content as a bargaining tool against Internet access and cable providers. For example, in October 2010, Fox unilaterally blocked access to its content by Cablevision subscribers—both via traditional cable and online—as part of a completely unrelated dispute between the companies. This is not a “network neutrality” concern as precisely understood, but could threaten the integrity of the open Internet as much as anti-competitive behavior by Internet access providers.
What you can do to help
- Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
- Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
- Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.
For more information
[log] =>
[revision_timestamp] => 1327417172
[format] => 2
[name] => admin
[picture] => files/pictures/picture-1.jpg
[data] => a:7:{s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:0;}s:7:"contact";i:0;s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:13:"form_build_id";s:37:"form-7305fc15609b6291d5b44eb2e6d9475a";s:9:"nodewords";a:9:{s:8:"abstract";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:9:"canonical";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:9:"copyright";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:11:"description";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:8:"keywords";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:13:"revisit-after";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:1:"1";}s:6:"robots";a:2:{s:5:"value";a:6:{s:9:"noarchive";i:0;s:8:"nofollow";i:0;s:7:"noindex";i:0;s:5:"noodp";i:0;s:9:"nosnippet";i:0;s:6:"noydir";i:0;}s:11:"use_default";i:0;}s:8:"dc.title";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:8:"location";a:2:{s:8:"latitude";s:0:"";s:9:"longitude";s:0:"";}}s:14:"wysiwyg_status";a:1:{i:7;i:7;}}
[path] => issues/network-neutrality-implications-online-vide
[print_display] => 1
[print_display_comment] => 0
[print_display_urllist] => 1
[print_mail_display] => 1
[print_mail_display_comment] => 0
[print_mail_display_urllist] => 1
[print_pdf_display] => 1
[print_pdf_display_comment] => 0
[print_pdf_display_urllist] => 1
[last_comment_timestamp] => 1318264382
[last_comment_name] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[taxonomy] => Array
(
)
[files] => Array
(
)
[iids] => Array
(
)
[page_title] =>
[nodewords] => Array
(
[abstract] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[canonical] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[copyright] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.contributor] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.creator] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.date] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[month] => 10
[day] => 10
[year] => 2011
)
)
[dc.title] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[description] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[keywords] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[location] => Array
(
[latitude] =>
[longitude] =>
)
[pics-label] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[revisit-after] => Array
(
[value] => 1
)
[robots] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[noarchive] => 0
[nofollow] => 0
[noindex] => 0
[noodp] => 0
[nosnippet] => 0
[noydir] => 0
)
[use_default] => 0
)
)
[build_mode] => 0
[readmore] => 1
[content] => Array
(
[print_links] => Array
(
[#weight] => -101
[#suffix] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#content_extra_fields] => Array
(
[title] => Array
(
[label] => Title
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -5
)
[body_field] => Array
(
[label] => Body
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 0
[view] => body
)
[revision_information] => Array
(
[label] => Revision information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 20
)
[author] => Array
(
[label] => Authoring information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 20
)
[options] => Array
(
[label] => Publishing options
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 25
)
[comment_settings] => Array
(
[label] => Comment settings
[description] => Comment module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[menu] => Array
(
[label] => Menu settings
[description] => Menu module form.
[weight] => -2
)
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[label] => Taxonomy
[description] => Taxonomy module form.
[weight] => -3
)
[path] => Array
(
[label] => Path settings
[description] => Path module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[attachments] => Array
(
[label] => File attachments
[description] => Upload module form.
[weight] => 30
[view] => files
)
[image_attach] => Array
(
[label] => Attached images
[description] => Image Attach module form.
[weight] => 0
)
[itunes] => Array
(
[label] => iTunes feed information
[description] => iTunes specific information.
[weight] => 0
)
[page_title] => Array
(
[label] => Page Title
[description] => Page Title form.
[weight] => -4
)
[path_redirect] => Array
(
[label] => URL redirects
[description] => Path redirect module listing
[weight] => 30
)
[print] => Array
(
[label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions
[description] => Print module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[xmlsitemap] => Array
(
[label] => XML sitemap
[description] => XML sitemap module form
[weight] => 30
)
[nodewords] => Array
(
[label] => Meta tags
[description] => Meta tags fieldset.
[weight] => 10
)
)
[#pre_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_alter_extra_weights
)
[body] => Array
(
[#weight] => 0
[#value] => There are many situations in which Internet access providers have the ability and incentive to block legal online video. A movie studio or cable company could potentially pay an Internet access provider to slow down or block their competitors. Internet access providers that are also cable providers have an anticompetitive incentive to slow or block alternative, online media. And Internet access providers that are cable providers and also content creators, like the merged entity that is Comcast-NBCU, have an even greater incentive to do so.
Public Knowledge’s Position
If permitted, these practices would prove detrimental not only to consumers, who would face fewer options for accessing video, but also to innovators in the online video space, who would see their ability to reach consumers subject to the anticompetitive whims of big media.
Public Knowledge is also against the use of blocking access to online content as a bargaining tool against Internet access and cable providers. For example, in October 2010, Fox unilaterally blocked access to its content by Cablevision subscribers—both via traditional cable and online—as part of a completely unrelated dispute between the companies. This is not a “network neutrality” concern as precisely understood, but could threaten the integrity of the open Internet as much as anti-competitive behavior by Internet access providers.
What you can do to help
- Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
- Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
- Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.
For more information
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] => There are many situations in which Internet access providers have the ability and incentive to block legal online video. A movie studio or cable company could potentially pay an Internet access provider to slow down or block their competitors. Internet access providers that are also cable providers have an anticompetitive incentive to slow or block alternative, online media. And Internet access providers that are cable providers and also content creators, like the merged entity that is Comcast-NBCU, have an even greater incentive to do so.
Public Knowledge’s Position
If permitted, these practices would prove detrimental not only to consumers, who would face fewer options for accessing video, but also to innovators in the online video space, who would see their ability to reach consumers subject to the anticompetitive whims of big media.
Public Knowledge is also against the use of blocking access to online content as a bargaining tool against Internet access and cable providers. For example, in October 2010, Fox unilaterally blocked access to its content by Cablevision subscribers—both via traditional cable and online—as part of a completely unrelated dispute between the companies. This is not a “network neutrality” concern as precisely understood, but could threaten the integrity of the open Internet as much as anti-competitive behavior by Internet access providers.
What you can do to help
- Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
- Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
- Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.
For more information
[#printed] => 1
)
[links] => Array
(
[print_html] => Array
(
[href] => print/6115
[title] => Printer-friendly version
[attributes] => Array
(
[title] => Display a printer-friendly version of this page.
[class] => print-page
[rel] => nofollow
)
[html] =>
[query] =>
)
)
)
