By Alex Curtis | May 01, 2006
Here's the Senate Telecom Bill that was previously discussed in the last two policy blog posts.
The bill reads much more like an appropriations bill than a traditional telecom bill, with pet-project type bills gathered from each member of the Commerce Committee. Think of it as the family Christmas tree, adorned with numerous "pet-legislation bulbs." The aim of the bill as a whole is unclear, as some of its parts are at odds with each other: promoting open competition in some areas (like wireless spectrum) while either not regulating monopolies (net neutrality) or over regulating local government (muni-telecom) in others.
The PDF can be found here
http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/stevens-cccbda-draft-20060501.pdf
stdClass Object
(
[nid] => 318
[type] => blog
[language] =>
[uid] => 2
[status] => 1
[created] => 1146517052
[changed] => 1146517934
[comment] => 1
[promote] => 1
[moderate] => 0
[sticky] => 0
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[vid] => 318
[revision_uid] => 2
[title] => Senate Draft Telecom Bill
[body] =>
Here's the Senate Telecom Bill that was previously discussed in the last two policy blog posts.
The bill reads much more like an appropriations bill than a traditional telecom bill, with pet-project type bills gathered from each member of the Commerce Committee. Think of it as the family Christmas tree, adorned with numerous "pet-legislation bulbs." The aim of the bill as a whole is unclear, as some of its parts are at odds with each other: promoting open competition in some areas (like wireless spectrum) while either not regulating monopolies (net neutrality) or over regulating local government (muni-telecom) in others.
The PDF can be found here
http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/stevens-cccbda-draft-20060501.pdf
[log] =>
[revision_timestamp] => 1146517934
[format] => 4
[name] => Alex Curtis
[picture] => files/pictures/picture-2.png
[data] => a:4:{s:7:"contact";i:0;s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:1;}s:14:"picture_delete";s:0:"";s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";}
[path] => blog/senate-draft-telecom-bill
[print_display] => 1
[print_display_comment] => 0
[print_display_urllist] => 1
[print_mail_display] => 1
[print_mail_display_comment] => 0
[print_mail_display_urllist] => 1
[print_pdf_display] => 1
[print_pdf_display_comment] => 0
[print_pdf_display_urllist] => 1
[last_comment_timestamp] => 1146517052
[last_comment_name] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[2] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 2
[vid] => 1
[name] => Policy Blog
[description] =>
[weight] => 0
)
[72] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 72
[vid] => 6
[name] => Blog Posts
[description] =>
[weight] => 0
)
[49] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 49
[vid] => 5
[name] => Intellectual Property
[description] =>
[weight] => 0
)
)
[files] => Array
(
)
[iids] => Array
(
)
[page_title] =>
[nodewords] => Array
(
)
[build_mode] => 0
[readmore] =>
[content] => Array
(
[print_links] => Array
(
[#weight] => -101
[#suffix] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#content_extra_fields] => Array
(
[title] => Array
(
[label] => Title
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -5
)
[body_field] => Array
(
[label] => Body
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 0
[view] => body
)
[revision_information] => Array
(
[label] => Revision information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 20
)
[author] => Array
(
[label] => Authoring information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 20
)
[options] => Array
(
[label] => Publishing options
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 25
)
[comment_settings] => Array
(
[label] => Comment settings
[description] => Comment module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[menu] => Array
(
[label] => Menu settings
[description] => Menu module form.
[weight] => -2
)
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[label] => Taxonomy
[description] => Taxonomy module form.
[weight] => -3
)
[path] => Array
(
[label] => Path settings
[description] => Path module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[attachments] => Array
(
[label] => File attachments
[description] => Upload module form.
[weight] => 30
[view] => files
)
[image_attach] => Array
(
[label] => Attached images
[description] => Image Attach module form.
[weight] => 0
)
[itunes] => Array
(
[label] => iTunes feed information
[description] => iTunes specific information.
[weight] => 0
)
[page_title] => Array
(
[label] => Page Title
[description] => Page Title form.
[weight] => -4
)
[path_redirect] => Array
(
[label] => URL redirects
[description] => Path redirect module listing
[weight] => 30
)
[print] => Array
(
[label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions
[description] => Print module form.
[weight] => 30
)
[xmlsitemap] => Array
(
[label] => XML sitemap
[description] => XML sitemap module form
[weight] => 30
)
[nodewords] => Array
(
[label] => Meta tags
[description] => Meta tags fieldset.
[weight] => 10
)
)
[#pre_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_alter_extra_weights
)
[body] => Array
(
[#weight] => 0
[#value] => Here's the Senate Telecom Bill that was previously discussed in the last two policy blog posts.
The bill reads much more like an appropriations bill than a traditional telecom bill, with pet-project type bills gathered from each member of the Commerce Committee. Think of it as the family Christmas tree, adorned with numerous "pet-legislation bulbs." The aim of the bill as a whole is unclear, as some of its parts are at odds with each other: promoting open competition in some areas (like wireless spectrum) while either not regulating monopolies (net neutrality) or over regulating local government (muni-telecom) in others.
The PDF can be found here
http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/stevens-cccbda-draft-20060501.pdf
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] => Here's the Senate Telecom Bill that was previously discussed in the last two policy blog posts.
The bill reads much more like an appropriations bill than a traditional telecom bill, with pet-project type bills gathered from each member of the Commerce Committee. Think of it as the family Christmas tree, adorned with numerous "pet-legislation bulbs." The aim of the bill as a whole is unclear, as some of its parts are at odds with each other: promoting open competition in some areas (like wireless spectrum) while either not regulating monopolies (net neutrality) or over regulating local government (muni-telecom) in others.
The PDF can be found here
http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/stevens-cccbda-draft-20060501.pdf
[#printed] => 1
)
[links] => Array
(
[print_html] => Array
(
[href] => print/318
[title] => Printer-friendly version
[attributes] => Array
(
[title] => Display a printer-friendly version of this page.
[class] => print-page
[rel] => nofollow
)
[html] =>
[query] =>
)
)
)
