Rescue Orphan Works

Tag: Resources

  1. Orphan Works: The 30,000 Foot View

    More on Orphan Works:

    Orphan works policy says: after a fruitless but diligent search for the owner, a user may use a copyrighted work without fear of statutory damages as long as the owner is paid if he returns.

    “Orphan Works” are copyrighted works — books, music, records, films, etc. — whose owner cannot be located. Works can become “orphaned” for a number of reasons: the owner did not register the work, the owner sold rights in the work and did not register the transfer, the owner died and his heirs cannot be found. Presently, there are millions of such works in existence, all of which are unavailable to the DJs, filmmakers, collage artists, libraries, educational institutions and other creative professionals and institutions who would like to pay for the ability to display and use them. Why not just use them? Because if someone uses an orphan work and the copyright owner does emerge, that user can be found liable for infringement which carries legal damages of up to $150,000 per work.

  2. Rescue Orphan Works!

    CLICK HERE TO WRITE YOUR LETTER NOW

    Orphan Works

    The House and Senate both introduced new legislation to allow for greater use of so-called “orphan works” — books, music, photos, movies or other works whose owners can’t be found. Why are these bills important? Because there are literally millions of works in existence that are currently under copyright protection but for which the copyright owner cannot be easily found. Because if you use a copyrighted work without permission, you could be on the hook for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work, orphans go unused.

    Think of a diary kept by someone during the second world war and recovered from an attic. Think of a box of old photographs happened upon at a yard sale. Think of an illustration used in an advertisement but not clearly attributed. At the moment, these works are unavailable to publishers, filmmakers, collage artists and many other creative professionals who would like to use them and gladly pay for the privilege, but can’t because of the potential for massive penalties if the original copyright owner does emerge.

    The newly introduced bills allow artists to use orphan works as long as that user makes a diligent effort to find the original copyright owner. In the unlikely event that the original owner does emerge, the compensation that a user pays should be reasonable. The two bills currently on the table — S. 2913, the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 (PDF link) and H.R. 5889: The Orphan Works Act of 2008 (PDF link) — go a long way to address these issues and if passed, would grant the public access to millions of previously inaccessible works of art.

    These Bills are being considered in there respective committees this week. We need you to write letters and call your Members of Congress to ask for them to support the bills and make a few tweaks.

  3. Letter: To Senate Judiciary Committee Leadership in Support of S. 1145: The Patent Reform Act of 2007

    The Honorable Patrick Leahy
    Chairman
    Committee on the Judiciary
    433 Russell Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510

    The Honorable Arlen Specter
    Ranking Member
    Committee on the Judiciary
    711 Hart Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510

    Re: Patent Reform Act of 2007

    Dear Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Specter:

    Issues

    Tags

  4. Letter: To House Judiciary Committee Leadership in Support of H.R. 1908: The Patent Reform Act of 2007

    The Honorable John Conyers, Jr.
    Chairman
    Committee on the Judiciary
    2426 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515

    The Honorable Lamar S. Smith
    Ranking Member
    Committee on the Judiciary
    2184 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515

    The Honorable Howard L. Berman
    Chairman
    Committee on the Judiciary
    Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property
    2221 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, D.C. 20515

    The Honorable Howard Coble
    Ranking Member
    Committee on the Judiciary
    Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property
    2468 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515

    Re: Patent Reform Act of 2007

    Dear Chairman Conyers, Ranking Member Smith, Chairman Berman, and Ranking Member Coble,

    Issues

    Tags

  5. Presentation: IT Perspectives From Inside the Beltway

    Presentation given on July 27th, 2007 by PK President Gigi Sohn at the EDUCAUSE/Cornell Institute for Computer Policy and Law, Cornell University.

    The full presentation is available in PDF format.

    A list of slides follows (after the jump):

  6. Joint Filing of Technology Sector Organizations and Public Interest Organizations Concerning Open Access

    This document is also available in PDF Format.

    July 18, 2007

    The Honorable Kevin J. Martin

    Chairman
    Federal Communications Commission
    445 12th St., SW
    Washington, DC 20554

    Re: Joint Filing of Technology Sector Organizations and Public Interest Organizations Concerning Open Access;
    WT Docket Nos. 96-86 and 06-150; PS Docket No. 06-229.

    Dear Chairman Martin:

  7. Reply Comments of Public Knowledge, et al. on Broadband Industry Practices, FCC Docket #07-52

    This filing is also available in PDF Format.

    Before the
    Federal Communications Commission
    Washington, D.C. 20554

    In the Matter of
    Broadband Industry Practices
    WC Docket No. 07-52

    To: The Commission

    Reply Comments of Public Knowledge, et al.

  8. Public Knowledge Comments to the FCC In the Matter of the XM/Sirius Merger

    Before the
    Federal Communications Commission
    Washington, D.C. 20554

    In the Matter of:

    Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and
    XM Satellite Radio Holdings
    Seek Approval to Transfer Control of
    FCC Authorizations and Licenses

    MB Docket No. 07-57

    To: The Commission

    COMMENTS OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE

    Public Knowledge submits these comments in response to the Public Notice1 in the above docketed proceedings. If the proposed merger withstands antitrust analysis, Public Knowledge supports the merger subject to conditions that will result in greater program diversity, increase consumer choice and keep prices in check.

    Full comments also available in PDF format.