<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicknowledge.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Tag: P2P</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p</link>
 <description>Tagged Items</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Higher Ed Needs an IT Policy Task Force</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; straight year, I addressed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sce.cornell.edu/exec/programs.php?v=12185&amp;amp;s=Overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EDUCAUSE/Cornell Institute for Computer Policy and Law&lt;/a&gt;, held at Cornell’s beautiful campus.  The Institute gathers 50+ higher education information technology (IT) professionals – usually campus CTOs, librarians and legal counsels, and teaches them the substantive particulars of IT policy issues and advises them how to be strong advocates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:11:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gigi Sohn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1709 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>George Ou: Protocol Agnostic doesn&#039;t mean Protocol Agnostic</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1661</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;George Ou, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=1087&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;former Technical Director of ZDNet&lt;/A&gt;, has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itif.org/index.php?s=staff#gou&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;found a new job&lt;/A&gt; where he continues to lead the technology sector by publishing innovative thoughts and ideas – sometimes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22richard+bennett%22+%22george+ou%22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not&lt;/A&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22brett+glass%22+%22george+ou%22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;necessarily&lt;/A&gt; his own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1661&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1661#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/open-standards">Open Standards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:48:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robb Topolski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1661 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast&#039;s Right Hand Admits FCC Jurisdiction, Left Hand Declines to Comment</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1642</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For months, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comcast.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comcast&lt;/a&gt; spokespeople have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&amp;amp;id_document=6519866175&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;deny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/19/comcast_fcc_legal_authority/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;deny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/FCC-Lacks-Firepower-To-Tackle-Comcast-Traffic-Shaping-94468&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;denying&lt;/a&gt; that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt; has the power to do anything about Comcast’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/comcastcomplaint&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;throttling&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BitTorrent&lt;/a&gt; traffic. Now, in papers filed as part of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart_v._Comcast&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;class action lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; against Comcast, Comcast has gone the opposite direction, asserting that because “these issues are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the FCC, and because the FCC is actively investigating them,” the judge should put the suit on hold until the FCC renders a decision. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;court&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/hart-v-comcast-order-20080625.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;agreed&lt;/a&gt;, staying the case until the FCC acts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1642&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1642#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/internet-protocol">Internet Protocol</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:12:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1642 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flash Gets Flashier With P2P</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you haven’t heard yet, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/releasenotes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beta&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adobe&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flash Player Version 10&lt;/a&gt; is available for &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;download&lt;/a&gt;. It offers a host of new features, but one has implications that blow the others out of the water: built-in &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/flash-p2p-now-thats-disruptive/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;peer-to-peer&lt;/a&gt;. That’s right, all the tools necessary to build a p2p client will be built into the Flash plug-in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1583&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1583#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/internet-protocol">Internet Protocol</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:19:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1583 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taking Net Neutrality to the Hill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1534</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just got back from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://senate.gov/&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Home.Home&quot;&gt;Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&amp;amp;Hearing_ID=4c66f979-3001-490a-a985-5be63951adb7&quot;&gt;hearing&lt;/a&gt; on the future of the Internet.  Much was said on both sides of the panelist table, so I’ll just take a moment to hit some highlights: competition and innovation, media consolidation and content, and FCC authority. One disclaimer: this summary represents (of course) how I interpreted the statements at the hearing. Where I can, I’ve included timestamps into the video; if you want more detail, &lt;a href=&quot;//video.webcastcenter.com/srs_g2/commerce042208.rm&quot;&gt;watch the hearing&lt;/a&gt; direct from the Senate’s web site. Also, check out our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1533&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1534&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1534#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/internet-protocol">Internet Protocol</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:56:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1534 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VIDEO: FCC hearing on Network Management at Stanford</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1526</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/#apr17&quot;&gt;FCC took a field trip&lt;/a&gt; to the campus of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.  There it heard from two panels of experts and policy shapers on the issue of network management and more broadly net neutrality.  If you didn&amp;#8217;t see it, or listen to the FCC&amp;#8217;s stream of it, thankfully, it&amp;#8217;s been video recorded and put on the web&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Panel I: Network Management and Consumer Expectations&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lessig.org/blog&quot;&gt;Professor Lessig&lt;/a&gt; presented one of his illustrative keynotes at the start, and apparently he recorded the live audio and dubbed it to the video later:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1526&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1526#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:40:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1526 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Knowledge Calls Comcast-Pando Proposal &#039;Ludicrous&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1524</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;For Immediate Release: &lt;span class=&quot;date-single&quot;&gt;April 15, 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comcast and Pando, a company working on a more efficient method of distributing peer-to-peer content, announced today they will work on a &amp;#8220;bill of rights&amp;#8221; for P2P users and Internet Service Providers.  The following is a statement from Gigi B. Sohn, president and co-founder of Public Knowledge:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1524&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:43:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1524 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>S. 4108, the APRIL Act, and the Realities Behind It</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1495</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OK. Hopefully you all realized that &lt;a href=&quot;//www.publicknowledge.org/node/1492&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S. 4108, the APRIL Act of 2008&lt;/a&gt;, was a joke. After all, there were a few excesses in there that would indicate how ludicrous the bill is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1495&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1495#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadcast-flag">Broadcast Flag</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/drm">DRM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/government-mandates">Government Mandates</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/wipo-broadcasters-treaty">WIPO Broadcasters Treaty</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:42:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sherwin Siy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1495 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast: Beaten, But Not Defeated</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1494</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comcast.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comcast&lt;/a&gt; has sent a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/comcast-letter-20080328.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;letter&lt;/a&gt; to FCC Chairman &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/martin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kevin Martin&lt;/a&gt; clarifying last week’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120658178504567453.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; that they were in discussions with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BitTorrent, Inc.&lt;/a&gt; about how to improve Comcast’s network management.  In short: Comcast has “admitted” nothing, they do not “block” applications or “discriminate,” and the old system they say they will be replacing is still completely legitimate. It seems that Comcast thinks that the FCC needs to keep on investigating the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1254&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt; as much as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1485&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;we do&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1494&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1494#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/internet-protocol">Internet Protocol</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:45:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1494 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast and BitTorrent: Together at Last? [Updated]</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1485</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Wall Street Journal is &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120658178504567453.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comcast.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comcast&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BitTorrent, Inc.&lt;/a&gt; are now working together to “collaborate on ways to run BitTorrent’s technology more smoothly on Comcast’s broadband network, and allow Comcast to transport video files more effectively over its own network.”  While we applaud application developers and network operators getting together to figure out how to improve the efficiency of the Internet, this changes nothing about the issues raised in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/comcastcomplaint&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;petitions&lt;/a&gt; on network management; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt; must still act quickly to ensure that its &lt;a href=&quot;http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-151A1.doc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;four principles&lt;/a&gt; for broadband service have real meaning and that consumers are protected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1485&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1485#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/open-standards">Open Standards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/internet-protocol">Internet Protocol</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:59:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1485 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
