<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicknowledge.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Tag: Piracy</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy</link>
 <description>Tagged Items</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Higher Ed Needs an IT Policy Task Force</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; straight year, I addressed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sce.cornell.edu/exec/programs.php?v=12185&amp;amp;s=Overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EDUCAUSE/Cornell Institute for Computer Policy and Law&lt;/a&gt;, held at Cornell’s beautiful campus.  The Institute gathers 50+ higher education information technology (IT) professionals – usually campus CTOs, librarians and legal counsels, and teaches them the substantive particulars of IT policy issues and advises them how to be strong advocates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:11:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gigi Sohn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1709 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protecting Consumers from DRM</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1694</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Consumer rights advocates and media companies have been fighting over digital rights management (DRM) software for many years now. In the age of the closing digital media store, the negative effects of DRM are more apparent than ever before. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just a few days ago Yahoo! announced it would be &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080724-drm-still-sucks-yahoo-music-going-dark-taking-keys-with-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;closing its music store&lt;/a&gt;, taking the authentication server for its DRM offline in September. This will leave its users without access to the content they believed they bought once they: switch computers, alter their operating system, or try to copy their Yahoo! store music to an MP3 player. Luckily for Yahoo! customers the company has said it will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-mon-tech-bits-aug04,0,2639953.story&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;compensate&lt;/a&gt; them for music they bought.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1694&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1694#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/analog-hole">Analog Hole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/drm">DRM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Noah Pepper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1694 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EBay Goes Four-for-Four...for Now</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1658</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday, Judge Richard Sullivan of the Southern District of New York &lt;a href=&quot;http://www1.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&amp;amp;id=83&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruled resoundingly for eBay in its defense against Tiffany’s various claims of trademark infringement&lt;/a&gt;. Coming as it does in the wake of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080630/bs_afp/franceonlinefinetrademarkcompanylvmhebay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eBay’s $63 million loss to Louis Vuitton in France&lt;/a&gt;, this decision stands as an unambiguous breath of sanity. It&amp;#8217;s great to see that France&amp;#8217;s nakedly protectionist, moral rights-influenced, lack-of-first-sale-doctrine decision has been quarantined to France for the time being. As Judge Sullivan affirmed, “The law clearly protects secondary markets in authentic goods.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Court detailed the myriad ways in which eBay extended itself in trying to accommodate Tiffany by removing listings featuring counterfeit Tiffany merchandise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1658&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1658#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/trademark">Trademark</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:58:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Abramowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1658 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t Stop Till You Get Enough IP Enforcement</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1656</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The first Senate hearing I attended struck me as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1620&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“dog and pony show”&lt;/a&gt; since the witnesses were presented for display purposes, merely echoing the pre-determined opinions of the presiding Senators. I’m beginning to see the animals in a less benign light.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.senate.gov/hearings/statements/071508mb.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Senator Baucus&lt;/a&gt; (D-MT), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, held a hearing on “&lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/hearing071508.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;International Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and American Competitiveness&lt;/a&gt;,” with Ranking Member, Senator Grassley (R-IA), in the wings and with Senators Kyl (R-AZ) and Roberts (R-KS) making cameo appearances towards the end. As for the witnesses, the deck was stacked, as appears to be more the norm than the exception.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1656&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1656#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/patent">Patent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/trademark">Trademark</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:03:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Abramowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1656 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>G8 Endorses ACTA: Great, so what’s in it?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1647</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In its &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121549460313835333.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&amp;#8220;Declaration on the World Economy&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;, the G-8 included an endorsement of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/acta&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ACTA&lt;/a&gt; and ongoing efforts to &amp;#8220;standardize&amp;#8221; IP enforcement through customs organizations. &amp;#8220;We encourage the acceleration of negotiations to establish a new international legal framework, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), and seek to complete the negotiation by the end of this year,&amp;#8221; the statement says.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we have a major endorsement of ACTA from the leadership of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. And pressure to have this international legal agreement ready to roll at the end of the year. So what&amp;#8217;s going to be in this critically important, possibly binding international agreement, to be completed in less than six months?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We have no idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1647&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1647#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/drm">DRM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/government-mandates">Government Mandates</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:39:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sherwin Siy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1647 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ACTA PUBLIC COMMENTS--One-Stop Shop</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1646</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We recently scanned all of the documents filed in response to the USTR&amp;#8217;s request for public comments regarding the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). They are presented below, if sometimes angularly, as well as on our issue summary page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/acta&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1646&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1646#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/patent">Patent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/trademark">Trademark</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Abramowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1646 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hearing: Protecting Consumers by Protecting Intellectual Property</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1613</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;dates&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-start&quot;&gt;June 17, 2008 - 10:00am  US/Eastern&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-separator&quot;&gt; to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-end&quot;&gt;June 17, 2008 - 12:00pm  US/Eastern&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rm 226, Dirksen Senate Office Building&lt;br /&gt;
Washington, DC&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has scheduled a hearing on &amp;#8220;Protecting Consumers by Protecting Intellectual Property&amp;#8221; for Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Office Building.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The hearing notice and witness list is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3416&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:28:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1613 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Art of the End Around</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1601</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Representatives from the US, EC, Japan, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, S. Korea, Canada, and Mexico have been holding close-to clandestine meetings over the past year to construct a trade agreement that &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080602-the-real-acta-threat-its-not-ipod-scanning-border-guards.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tightens the level of regulations&lt;/a&gt; on IP-related goods and services. This proposed pact is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement&lt;/a&gt;. No official agendas or results of the talks have been released, though a &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikileaks.org/leak/acta-proposal-2007.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“discussion paper”&lt;/a&gt; was leaked to Wikileaks in late May. This discussion paper is the basic extent of the world’s knowledge on ACTA, yet some version of ACTA will apparently be up for adoption at the G8 Summit in July.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1601&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1601#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/patent">Patent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/trademark">Trademark</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:17:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Abramowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1601 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Responding to Your Comments on Orphan Works</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1593</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1584&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;policy blog&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gigi-sohn/searching-for-the-art-of_b_103000.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt; responses to Larry Lessig&amp;#8217;s New York Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/opinion/20lessig.html?scp=1&amp;amp;sq=Lessig&amp;amp;st=nyt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; on orphan works last week, I have received a large number of fairly unfriendly comments and emails.  I won&amp;#8217;t quote them here for fear of being sued for copyright infringement (I wish I was kidding).  Rather than respond to each one individually, I address the vast majority of the arguments raised in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1594&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;speech,&lt;/a&gt; which I will be giving today at a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.umuc.edu/mkting/cip/index2.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;conference&lt;/a&gt; at the University of Maryland University College.  I look forward to a new barrage of comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1593#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/orphan-works">Orphan Works</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:03:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gigi Sohn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1593 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Zune and NBC Universal Copyright Filtering Collaboration</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1555</link>
 <description>&lt;img align=right src=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/files/images/copyright-filtering.png&quot;/&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you haven&amp;#8217;t read about it, the New York Times reported yesterday that: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/microsoft-may-build-a-copyright-cop-into-every-zune/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Microsoft May Build a Copyright Cop Into Every Zune&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Essentially, the large content provider would withhold their content from a distributor unless the distributor put in effective measures to prevent against piracy.  We&amp;#8217;re not talking about DRM here, we&amp;#8217;re talking about filtering software, whether it resides on the playback device like a Zune or iPod, or in the software on a syncing computer that stores the consumers&amp;#8217; library of music and movies like the Zune or iTunes software.  This software would troll your library checking for content that was somehow infringing or unauthorized.  It may even be spyware that could report back to someone about the contents of your media library.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1555&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1555#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fair-use">Fair Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:24:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1555 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
