In January, 2012, both PIPA and SOPA were shelved.
Read about how your work to fight these bills paid off!
To stay updated on issues like this, sign up for our email list on the right →
The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, S.968, or the PROTECT IP Act, also known as PIPA, would have allowed the Attorney General to require domain name registries to "suspend operation of, and lock, the domain name" of a website the DoJ determines to be "dedicated to infringing activity."
No one favors the theft of intellectual property, but there are a number of serious issues with the way both PIPA and SOPA try to tackle the legitimate concern of websites that infringe copyright:
In January, 2012, both PIPA and SOPA were shelved.
Read about how your work to fight these bills paid off!
To stay updated on issues like this, sign up for our email list on the right →
The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, S.968, or the PROTECT IP Act, also known as PIPA, would have allowed the Attorney General to require domain name registries to "suspend operation of, and lock, the domain name" of a website the DoJ determines to be "dedicated to infringing activity."
No one favors the theft of intellectual property, but there are a number of serious issues with the way both PIPA and SOPA try to tackle the legitimate concern of websites that infringe copyright:
More information on PIPA and SOPA
[log] => [revision_timestamp] => 1331139639 [format] => 7 [name] => Katy Tasker [picture] => files/pictures/picture-3459.png [data] => a:6:{s:7:"contact";i:0;s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:1;}s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:13:"form_build_id";s:37:"form-66da78a3d68000723cc608f250b717de";s:14:"wysiwyg_status";a:1:{i:7;i:7;}} [path] => take-stand-against-pipa-call-your-senator-now [field_act_now_image] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 1 [print_display_urllist] => 0 [print_mail_display] => 1 [print_mail_display_comment] => 1 [print_mail_display_urllist] => 0 [print_pdf_display] => 0 [print_pdf_display_comment] => 0 [print_pdf_display_urllist] => 0 [webform] => Array ( [nid] => 6419 [confirmation] => [confirmation_format] => 1 [redirect_url] =>In January, 2012, both PIPA and SOPA were shelved.
Read about how your work to fight these bills paid off!
To stay updated on issues like this, sign up for our email list on the right →
The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, S.968, or the PROTECT IP Act, also known as PIPA, would have allowed the Attorney General to require domain name registries to "suspend operation of, and lock, the domain name" of a website the DoJ determines to be "dedicated to infringing activity."
No one favors the theft of intellectual property, but there are a number of serious issues with the way both PIPA and SOPA try to tackle the legitimate concern of websites that infringe copyright:
More information on PIPA and SOPA
[#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [#pre_render] => Array ( [0] => content_alter_extra_weights ) [#content_extra_fields] => Array ( [webform] => Array ( [label] => Webform [description] => Webform client form. [weight] => -2 ) [title] => Array ( [label] => Title [description] => Node module form. [weight] => -5 ) [body_field] => Array ( [label] => Body [description] => Node module form. [weight] => -3 [view] => body ) [revision_information] => Array ( [label] => Revision information [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 2 ) [author] => Array ( [label] => Authoring information [description] => Node module form. [weight] => -1 ) [options] => Array ( [label] => Publishing options [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 1 ) [comment_settings] => Array ( [label] => Comment settings [description] => Comment module form. [weight] => 3 ) [menu] => Array ( [label] => Menu settings [description] => Menu module form. [weight] => 4 ) [taxonomy] => Array ( [label] => Taxonomy [description] => Taxonomy module form. [weight] => -3 ) [path] => Array ( [label] => Path settings [description] => Path module form. [weight] => 0 ) [attachments] => Array ( [label] => File attachments [description] => Upload module form. [weight] => 30 [view] => files ) [itunes] => Array ( [label] => iTunes feed information [description] => iTunes specific information. [weight] => 0 ) [path_redirect] => Array ( [label] => URL redirects [description] => Path redirect module listing [weight] => 30 ) [print] => Array ( [label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions [description] => Print module form. [weight] => 5 ) [xmlsitemap] => Array ( [label] => XML sitemap [description] => XML sitemap module form [weight] => 30 ) [nodewords] => Array ( [label] => Meta tags [description] => Meta tags fieldset. [weight] => 10 ) ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>In January, 2012, both PIPA and SOPA were shelved.
Read about how your work to fight these bills paid off!
To stay updated on issues like this, sign up for our email list on the right →
The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, S.968, or the PROTECT IP Act, also known as PIPA, would have allowed the Attorney General to require domain name registries to "suspend operation of, and lock, the domain name" of a website the DoJ determines to be "dedicated to infringing activity."
No one favors the theft of intellectual property, but there are a number of serious issues with the way both PIPA and SOPA try to tackle the legitimate concern of websites that infringe copyright:
preserves| STAY CONNECTED, JOIN OUR MAILING LIST |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
Copyright © 2011: Public Knowledge
Social network icons by Komodo Media and Deleket.com

