Last night Public Knowledge joined with Internet activists gathered in New York City, San Francisco, and Washington, DC (I attended the DC gathering) to formerly launch the Internet Defense League. The purpose of the league is to provide an organizing tool for many of the forces that came together to defeat SOPA and PIPA. Given that beating those bills was a political victory of comic book super hero proportions, the league naturally has its own “Cat Signal” showcased here, here, and here.
Posts by Ernesto Falcon:
The latest controversy with the Intellectual Property Attaché Act, formerly a provision within the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), is entirely self-inflicted by its lead sponsors.
It has been reported that NBCUniversal, News Corporation, and Walt Disney Company will block access to Hulu unless you pay for both a broadband subscription and a paid TV subscription. Such a move will prevent an estimated 3.58 million people from becoming Hulu customers and likely stifle Hulu’s future success. Who else but the executives who brought you the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) would actively strangle their own Internet success story? With an annual doubling of revenue and average monthly growth of 100,000 paid subscribers, it must be that Hulu was too successful (and disruptive) for its stakeholders to handle. So rather than embrace the Internet, they have opted to reverse course and try to preserve the increasingly rejected business model of cable and satellite TV.
The fight for a globally unified and open Internet will never end, but so far the Internet community has been on a winning streak. This has become apparent to both Congress and to the forces that supported SOPA. It is this dynamic that has prompted the preemptive effort by policy makers attempting to pass major cyber security legislation to explain how their legislation is not SOPA.
It is also what is fueling the effort by SOPA supporters and their allies in government to keep everything that is happening in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) a mystery to the public.
In a blatant act of hypocrisy, Cary Sherman the chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), as well as his allies, are claiming that the public was misinformed about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP (PIPA) when they opposed those bills. As Sherman said, “misinformation may be a dirty trick, but it works.” His organization would know given that for more than a year the RIAA, Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and other pro-SOPA and pro-PIPA allies actively engaged in misinforming Congress on the implications of the SOPA and PIPA.
Several million of you have called or met with your Senators over the last few weeks and have expressed your opposition to the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). The grassroots campaign has been enormously successful in having prominent Senators retreat from their support of PIPA and commit to voting no to ensure that PIPA receives a thorough vetting. That being said, I have noticed a trend in statements by Senators that gives the appearance that they are listening to your opposition, but ultimately will vote for the bill next week.
To start, there is no such thing as an infinite filibuster based on one person objecting to a bill passing. Such a dynamic is the stuff of Hollywood movies (ironically) and has not existed in the United States Senate for decades. Below I will summarize how the process will work and why citizen involvement over the next few weeks is critical. For a very detailed explanation of how the Senate filibuster works you should read this Congressional Research Service report.
This is the question that is before Congress as it decides on what to do with the Domain Name Server filtering provisions in the Stopping Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). Public Knowledge has advocated from the beginning against this provision because it would make the Internet less secure, sacrifice our moral high ground internationally, and to top it off it will do nothing to deter Internet piracy. So while many would experience revulsion at the idea of adopting any tool that is used in the Great Firewall of China, the proponents of SOPA and PIPA have in fact, embraced it.
As Congress considers adopting a scorched earth policy towards Internet piracy via legislation known as the Stopping Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act, recent events have highlighted the gravity of the trade-off that is being contemplated. Last week the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) unveiled Operation Ghost Click, a multi-year operation that dismantled an international cyber ring that hacked into four million computers worldwide (500,000 of these computers were in U.S. homes, businesses, and government agencies). This entire cyber criminal operation was run by a grand total of six people (that is one person for every 666,667 computers) who successfully stole $14 million by manipulating Internet advertising revenue.
As part of its campaign to conquer the wireless market by buying out T-Mobile, the fourth-largest wireless carrier, AT&T is trying to tell anyone who will listen that going from four national carriers to two will actually lower prices. They even have fancy charts and graphs to prove it.
Nothing of the sort will happen. Rather, the result will be just the opposite. AT&T will be sitting along with Verizon to create a national duopoly of big carriers. They will also gain a monopoly on GSM wireless technology, as AT&T and T-Mobile are the only national carriers that provide national GSM coverage. But in an effort to distract from this reality, AT&T is using modified charts and irrelevant statistics to make its case.