Proposed Changes to One Phone Unlocking Bill
Proposed Changes to One Phone Unlocking Bill
Proposed Changes to One Phone Unlocking Bill

    Get Involved Today

    Amendment would improve the “Bandaid Bill” by allowing you to get help unlocking your phone, but changes won’t last.



    Tomorrow
    the House Judiciary Committee will be offering amendments to one of the phone unlocking bills currently before it.

    That bill, which was introduced by Rep. Goodlatte, the
    Chairman of the committee, provides a temporary fix to the cell phone unlocking
    problem. (That original bill is available here)
    Should it pass, users would once again be able to alter the firmware on their
    phones so that they can use the phones they’ve bought with a new network. This
    change to the law would last until the Library of Congress’s next rulemaking on circumvention,
    likely a couple of years from now.

    The new changes to that bill would expand its scope
    slightly, allowing users to have someone else unlock their phone for them. This
    is particularly useful for people who aren’t able to unlock their phones by
    themselves. Without the change, someone who offered to unlock your phone for
    you would be at risk of breaking the law.

    This amendment would be a small but welcome improvement to
    the existing Goodlatte bill. However, the fix still remains temporary. Once the
    next rulemaking rolls around, its fixes all disappear, leaving consumers back
    in the hands of the process that put unlocking in jeopardy in the first place.

    And even if the rulemaking does the right thing then, it
    still might not be able to renew the exemption for unlocking services that this
    new amendment creates, meaning that the process doesn’t just start all over
    again for consumers and the Copyright Office; it starts all over again for
    Congress, too, and we’ll be right back where we are today.

    So while it’s a nice step in the right direction for phone
    unlocking, even this amendment can’t be the end of this process and this
    discussion. Proposals like Lofgren’s
    1201 reform bill
     need to be taken up and discussed in Congress before
    too long. Otherwise consumers, carriers, the Copyright Office, and Congress
    will all be right back on the merry-go-round in a few short years’ time.

    Original image by Flickr user Travis Isaacs.