It’s no longer a debate: people recognize that the anticircumvention provisions of the DMCA are flawed. Insofar as they keep people from doing things like unlocking their cell phones, over 100,000 people and the White House have said so, members of Congress have said so, and the FCC has said so. There’s also widespread recognition that the DMCA as a whole needs reevaluation, which the Register of Copyrights recognizes.
So why are we seeing simultaneous efforts to double down on enforcing a defective law?Read More
A Quick Guide to the Current Phone Unlocking BillsMarch 22, 2013 DMCA , DRM , Internet Blueprint
Cell Phone Unlocking Debate Highlights Trade Negotiation Process ProblemsMarch 18, 2013 DRM , ITU , TPP
The issue of cell phone unlocking has been hot for the past month. The White House response to the over 100,000 person petition to allow for the unlocking of cell phones has led to a flurry of legislative proposals in Congress and broad interest in a quick solution to the issue.Read More
No One’s “Signed Away” the Right to Unlock Cell PhonesMarch 14, 2013 DMCA , DRM , Forum Shopping , USTR
Several people have raised the specter of trade agreements standing in the way of cell phone unlocking. The basic idea is that, in a broad trade negotiation between the US and South Korea (and in a number of others), the two countries agreed to make sure their copyright laws had certain similar features. Among those were requirements that they have laws against breaking digital locks to access copyrighted works, and that they only have certain kinds of exemptions to them. Cell phone unlocking is not one of the specific exemptions.
Mike Masnick at Techdirt characterizes this (at least in the article’s title) as the US “signing away” its ability to enact a more permanent exemption for phone unlocking.Read More
Cell Phone Unlocking: The Root of the Problem (and Solution) is in CopyrightMarch 5, 2013 Copyright Office , DMCA , DRM , Internet Blueprint
Yesterday, the White House responded to a We the People petition on phone unlocking, stating that consumers should be able to unlock their cell phones and tablets. This puts the administration in line with a large number of consumers who are upset that the Library of Congress refused to exempt phone unlocking (modifying phone software so consumers can use their phones with a different mobile phone company) from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA.”)
However, the White House statement doesn’t reverse the Library’s decision, and nothing in the statement seems to suggest that it plans to.Read More