Our Disgraceful Internet PolicySeptember 7, 2007 Blog Posts , FCC , Internet Protocol , Network Neutrality
Earlier today (Sept. 6), the Justice Department filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opposing Net Neutrality. The DoJ, supposedly the protector of consumers and guardian of competition, said that "market forces" were sufficient to do both of those jobs.
That view, of course, is nonsense. Perhaps the DoJ failed to recall that there are no "market forces," and that the market for broadband services is controlled by two industries and that consumers have very little choice. Just how little choice we have was made clear to me earlier this summer.
In August, my wife and I went to Jasper, Alberta, a little town in the northern part of Jasper National Park. One morning, we had breakfast with a couple we had met in an excursion around the area. They are from Derby (pronounced Darby), a city of about 233,000 located in the center of England, far from London.Read More
Not long ago, we posted a story about how the powers that be in Major League Baseball were grousing about the Slingbox device which actually allows more people to watch their favorite teams play.
According to the Wall Street Journal, MLB still doesn't like the place-shifting abilities of Sling, but is backing off for now of threats from law suits. Perhaps the universally negative coverage of the controversy from the tech press, including Network World, CNET's Charles Cooper, Engadget, as well as the Huffington Post, and many other sites, persuaded Major League Baseball to see the error of their ways.Read More
My name is John Bergmayer, and I am a summer intern here at Public Knowledge. I am a student at the University of Colorado Law School. Issues such as the ones Public Knowledge works on are what drove me to law school in the first place. Law is the place where technology, culture, and policy collide. I wanted to be more than a rubbernecker.
I'm here in DC for the summer, but normally I live in Boulder, Colorado with my girlfriend, Susie, my dog, Edmund, and Meow Zedong and Paw the cats. In addition to law, I am interested in technology, literature, music, Macintosh computers, and BMX. I'll be working on (and blogging about) communications and intellectual property issues. More over here.Read More
Public Interest Groups Want FCC To Create Wireless Broadband CompetitionMay 24, 2007 Blog Posts , Spectrum Reform
The comments were due yesterday at the FCC on the proposals for how the auction of the valuable 700 MHz spectrum should be conducted. PK was part of a group of public-interest organizations that made recommendations on how the spectrum should be used best to try to break up the duopoly that telephone and cable companies have on high-speed broadband, or at least add some semblance of competition.
Also filing with us as the Ad Hoc Public Interest Spectrum Coalition were (in alphabetical order): Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, EDUCAUSE, Free Press, Media Access Project, New America Foundation and U.S. Public Interest Research Group.
In its comments on the 700 MHz auction, the coalition said that the Commission should act "both to ensure that new spectrum is offered on an open and nondiscriminatory basis and to bring in new entrants interested in challenging the current cozy wireless oligopoly and broadband duopoly."Read More
Mostly Pleasant Surprises and One Expected Unpleasantness at “Future of Video” HearingMay 10, 2007 Blog Posts , Fair Use , Internet Protocol , Network Neutrality , Piracy
Folks outside the Beltway may not be aware that since the beginning of the year, House Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee Chair Ed Markey has been holding a series of "big picture" hearings on the "Digital Future of the United States," featuring some of the world's leading thinkers. For example, his first hearing had one witness – World Wide Web creator Sir Tim Berners-Lee talking about how the web came to be what it is today. Other hearings focused on among other things, spectrum and wireless issues, the future of radio, and International broadband deployment. The core idea behind these hearings is to educate members of the Subcommittee about the state of technology and broadband deployment, and not get too mired in the narrow day-to-day policy debates that groups like PK care so much about. A wise strategy for a new Congress, if you ask me.Read More