Items tagged "Jamming"
Public Interest Groups Ask FCC to Declare BART Actions UnlawfulAugust 29, 2011 Interference , Jamming , Mobile Communication , Press Release , Wireless
Contact: Harold Feld
On August 11, 2011, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), anticipating protests and demonstrations in its stations, shut down access to cellular communications, disrupted mobile phone and data service to a massive number of consumers for up to four hours.
Today, Public Knowledge, along with a coalition of other public interest organizations, listed below, urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to immediately find that BART violated federal law and to clarify that local government agencies may not interfere with access to mobile phone networks.Read More
PK and Others Urge FCC to Prevent State, Local Cell ShutdownsMay 30, 2012 BART , FCC , Jamming , Mobile Communication , Wireless
Today, we filed comments with a number of other public interest groups urging the FCC to issue rules that would prevent state and local governments from shutting off cell service in situations like the BART protests of last summer.
The comments that we filed today were replies to several issues raised in the first round. In particular, we were responding to arguments raised about who gets to initiate shutdowns, the constitutionality of some proposed and existing shutdown procedures, and the fact that government agencies cutting of access to the public airwaves still runs afoul of the First Amendment, even if they’re cutting off access in areas that aren’t traditional public forums.Read More
PK Urges FCC to Prevent Emergency Wireless Service InterruptionsMay 2, 2012 Interference , Jamming , Mobile Communication , Public Safety , Radio Interference
This week, Public Knowledge, along with the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and several other public interest groups, urged the FCC to ensure that neither government agencies nor wireless providers shut down communications in an emergency.
The comments, also signed by the Benton Foundation, Free Press, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, Minority Media Telecommunications Council, and the Open Technology Institute of the New America Foundation, respond to the FCC’s Notice of Inquiry, which asked about what procedures should be followed when government wanted to shut down communications during a crisis.
Government-Ordered Wireless Shutdowns: Possibly Unconstitutional, Likely Illegal, Never a Great IdeaMarch 14, 2012 FCC , Jamming , Mobile Communication , Public Safety , Regulation
As Kara noted last week, the FCC is asking you to comment on when it’s appropriate for government agencies to cut off cellular services in the interests of public safety. For a variety of reasons, my initial answer to that is “rarely, if ever.” Aside from definite knowledge of a cell phone-triggered bomb, or a freak occurrence where the 800-900MHz range somehow interfered with a pacemaker, it just doesn’t seem like a particularly good idea. There’s a host of reasons why, and a lot of them were argued in the wake of BART’s October shutdown of cell service in anticipation of a protest. But this isn’t about BART; it’s about preventing future unnecessary shutdowns.
Jamming Prison Cell Phones Threatens Public Safety, Groups Tell SenateJuly 14, 2009 Jamming , Mobile Communication , Press Release , Public Safety
A day in advance of a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on legislation (S. 251) to allow interference with cellular phones in prisons, nine public interest groups and consumer organizations told the Committee in a July 14 letter that the legislation would cause more serious problems than it would solve.
"Public Knowledge et al., Letter in Opposition to S.251, The Safe Prison Communications Act (SPCA)"Read More
Public Knowledge Urges FCC to Prevent Future BART-like ShutdownsAugust 29, 2011 Jamming , Mobile Communication , Non-Discrimination , Public Safety , Radio Interference
Today, Public Knowledge, joined by a wide variety of consumer, civil rights, and civil liberties groups, urged the FCC to immediately pass rules that would prevent local authorities from ordering a shutdown of wireless services the way that BART did earlier this month. As Harold’s earlier blog post points out, we don’t even need to get to the (extremely pressing and important) First Amendment issues to find that BART’s actions violated the law—the Communications Act, to be precise.Read More
When Banning Works Better than Blocking: Bill Proposes to Make Prison Cell (Phones) ContrabandJuly 22, 2010 Competition , Enforcement , Jamming , Mobile Communication , Wireless
The Associated Press brings us the news that both house of Congress have passed parallel bills to ban the use of cell phones and other wireless devices in federal prisons. The bill, S. 1749, was introduced to curb the illicit use of cell phones within prisons to conduct criminal business from inside prisons.
This solution stands in stark contrast to one that had been shopped around not too long ago by vendors of cell blocking tech, where prisons would install jammers to block cellular signals in and around prisons. Fortunately, instead of trotting out a technological solution (with its concomitant negative effects on legitimate users) to what is a broader problem, this bill attempts to address the problem by using tools already in place within the system.Read More
Cell Phone Jamming For Prisons: Because There’s Nothing Like A “Solution” That Creates Problems andJuly 14, 2009 Interference , Jamming , Public Safety , Radio Interference , Wireless
As I've blogged over at Tales of the Sausage Factory, my even snarkier and wonkier blog, a company called CellAntenna continues to try to leverage the problem of cell phone smuggling into prisons t expand its product line. Sadly, they keep gaining momentum, as lots of people (particularly prison wardens) would like to believe that a new tech gadget can solve their problems.Read More